<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div>Tatiana,</div><div><br></div><div>On 29 Mar 2013, at 1:11 PM, Tatiana V. Martsinkevich wrote:</div><div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue'; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; ">So we went the other way around and changed the type of MPI_Pattern from void* to integer and now fortran interfaces are being generated correctly.</span></blockquote></div><div><br></div>You are aware, I hope, that (the default) Integers can be 32 bits or 64 bits with 64-bit compilers? As far as I am aware, the Fortran standard does not prescribe that default Kind Integers be the same size as pointers. I don't know what the MPI standard says or assumes on this topic.<div><br><div>Larry Baker<br>US Geological Survey<br>650-329-5608<br><a href="mailto:baker@usgs.gov">baker@usgs.gov</a><br><br></div></div></body></html>