<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv=Content-Type></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,sans-serif">Thanks a lot for the explanation<BR><BR>Sent from my Windows phone</DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>
<HR>
<SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,sans-serif; FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From: </SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,sans-serif"><A href="mailto:balaji@mcs.anl.gov">Pavan Balaji</A></SPAN><BR><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,sans-serif; FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent: </SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,sans-serif">12/25/2013 22:25</SPAN><BR><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,sans-serif; FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To: </SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,sans-serif"><A href="mailto:discuss@mpich.org">discuss@mpich.org</A></SPAN><BR><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,sans-serif; FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject: </SPAN><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt; FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,sans-serif">Re: [mpich-discuss] Alternative for -nolocal</SPAN><BR><BR></DIV><BR>On Dec 24, 2013, at 10:40 AM, Madhawa Bandara <madawa911@gmail.com> wrote:<BR>> Is there an alternative for the -nolocal option when I execute mpiexec? <BR><BR>-nolocal is no longer required. mpiexec takes the list of hosts you want to run the application on. If you don’t give the local host in that list, it won’t run anything locally.<BR><BR>> What's the difference between mpirun and mpiexec?<BR><BR>None. Both of them are symbolic links to mpiexec.hydra.<BR><BR> — Pavan<BR><BR>--<BR>Pavan Balaji<BR>http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji<BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>discuss mailing list discuss@mpich.org<BR>To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:<BR>https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss<BR></BODY></HTML>