[mpich-devel] [mpich2-dev] And yet another ROMIO performance question
robl at mcs.anl.gov
Thu Oct 17 10:32:40 CDT 2013
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 02:57:45PM -0500, Bob Cernohous wrote:
> Same customer noticed that the file system was doing much more i/o than
> MPIIO on collective reads.
Hi Bob. Did you ever get an acceptable answer to this 4 year old
Have you ever had anyone respond to a 4 year old message? Let's see
how well lotus notes handles /that/.
Sorry it took me so long to give you an answer. By the time I figured
out what was going on, I forgot you needed an answer. In my meager
defense, my daughter was 6 weeks old back then....
What happens is two-phase implements data sieving. Normally, this is
good. On Blue Gene, we turn on two-phase all the time (the hint is
"enable", not "automatic"), even when accesses are not overlapping.
So, consider a file domain where the first and last bytes are written.
(e.g. a parallel-netcdf application is reading from a file with record
variables). ROMIO will issue one read for the entire file domain.
Writes are even worse: ROMIO will read in the entire file domain,
modify the regions, and write it out.
Not sure the best way to fix this. Probably stick in a few peephole
optimizations, like if there's only one access in a file domain, just
go ahead and issue that one access.
A "real" fix would have to build up a basic performance model so we
could answer the question of where the tradeoff of "big request with
extra wasted data" beats "many small requests, but no wasted data".
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Lab, IL USA
More information about the devel