[mpich-discuss] unsubscribe

Nachiket Gokhale gokhalen at gmail.com
Mon Dec 24 06:28:25 CST 2012


Unsubscribe

On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Pavan Balaji <balaji at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> There should not be any difference in which MPI is used for any
> high-level library.  Did you try running MPICH with simpler programs?
> Does that work correctly?
>
>  -- Pavan
>
> On 08/30/2012 02:41 AM US Central Time, Angel de Vicente wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> last days I have been trying Paramesh
>> (http://www.physics.drexel.edu/~olson/paramesh-doc/Users_manual/amr.html). I'm
>> using version 4.1, and I managed to make it work with one of the newest
>> Intel compilers and OpenMPI, but with the latest MPICH2 version, the
>> code works OK only if I run it in one processor, giving bogus results or
>> aborting whenever I try to run it with more processors.
>>
>> By any chance, anyone here has any experience with Paramesh+MPICH2?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpich-discuss mailing list     mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
>> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/mpich-discuss
>>
>
> --
> Pavan Balaji
> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list     discuss at mpich.org
> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss



More information about the discuss mailing list