gokhalen at gmail.com
Mon Dec 24 06:28:25 CST 2012
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Pavan Balaji <balaji at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> There should not be any difference in which MPI is used for any
> high-level library. Did you try running MPICH with simpler programs?
> Does that work correctly?
> -- Pavan
> On 08/30/2012 02:41 AM US Central Time, Angel de Vicente wrote:
>> last days I have been trying Paramesh
>> (http://www.physics.drexel.edu/~olson/paramesh-doc/Users_manual/amr.html). I'm
>> using version 4.1, and I managed to make it work with one of the newest
>> Intel compilers and OpenMPI, but with the latest MPICH2 version, the
>> code works OK only if I run it in one processor, giving bogus results or
>> aborting whenever I try to run it with more processors.
>> By any chance, anyone here has any experience with Paramesh+MPICH2?
>> mpich-discuss mailing list mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
>> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> Pavan Balaji
> discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
More information about the discuss