[mpich-discuss] MPI_Win_fence failed
Sufeng Niu
sniu at hawk.iit.edu
Wed Jul 10 12:33:41 CDT 2013
Hi Jeff
Sorry to send so many emails which messed up discuss group email.
I found that the scientific image is too large to upload on github. so I
put it on the ftp:
ftp://ftp.xray.aps.anl.gov/pub/sector8/ there is 55Fe_run5_dark.tif file.
just put the tif file with the source code. Sorry again on my frequently
email broadcast. Thank you so much for your debugging help
Sufeng
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:08 PM, <discuss-request at mpich.org> wrote:
> Send discuss mailing list submissions to
> discuss at mpich.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> discuss-request at mpich.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> discuss-owner at mpich.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of discuss digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: MPI_Win_fence failed (Jeff Hammond)
> 2. Re: MPI_Win_fence failed (Sufeng Niu)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:05:09 -0500
> From: Jeff Hammond <jeff.science at gmail.com>
> To: discuss at mpich.org
> Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] MPI_Win_fence failed
> Message-ID:
> <CAGKz=
> uJ-aoHqK5A_tS6YfWaaxjw5AjhHM7xL1A0XaUSUjKvDcQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> use dropbox, pastebin, etc. for attachments. it makes life a lot
> easier for everyone.
>
> jeff
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Sufeng Niu <sniu at hawk.iit.edu> wrote:
> > Sorry, I found that this discussion email cannot add figure or
> attachment.
> >
> > the backtrace information is below:
> >
> > processes Location PC
> > Host Rank ID Status
> > 7 _start
> > 0x00402399
> > `-7 _libc_start_main
> > 0x3685c1ecdd
> > `-7 main
> > 0x00402474
> > `-7 dkm
> > ...
> > |-6 image_rms
> > 0x004029bb
> > | `-6 rms
> > 0x00402d44
> > | `-6 PMPI_Win_fence
> 0x0040c389
> > | `-6 MPIDI_Win_fence
> 0x004a45f4
> > | `-6 MPIDI_CH3I_RMAListComplete 0x004a27d3
> > | `-6 MPIDI_CH3I_Progress ...
> > `-1 udp
> > 0x004035cf
> > `-1 PMPI_Win_fence
> 0x0040c389
> > `-1 MPIDI_Win_fence
> 0x004a45a0
> > `-1 MPIDI_CH3I_Progress 0x004292f5
> > `-1 MPIDI_CH3_PktHandler_Get 0x0049f3f9
> > `-1 MPIDI_CH3_iSendv
> 0x004aa67c
> > `- memcpy
> > 0x3685c89329 164.54.54.122 0 20.1-13994 Stopped
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:39 AM, <discuss-request at mpich.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Send discuss mailing list submissions to
> >> discuss at mpich.org
> >>
> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >> discuss-request at mpich.org
> >>
> >> You can reach the person managing the list at
> >> discuss-owner at mpich.org
> >>
> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >> than "Re: Contents of discuss digest..."
> >>
> >>
> >> Today's Topics:
> >>
> >> 1. Re: MPI_Win_fence failed (Sufeng Niu)
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Message: 1
> >> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:39:39 -0500
> >>
> >> From: Sufeng Niu <sniu at hawk.iit.edu>
> >> To: discuss at mpich.org
> >> Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] MPI_Win_fence failed
> >> Message-ID:
> >>
> >> <CAFNNHkz8pBfX33icn=+3rdXvqDfWqeu58odpd=mOXLciysHgfg at mail.gmail.com>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >>
> >>
> >> Sorry I forget to add screen shot for backtrace. the screen shot is
> >> attached.
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot!
> >>
> >> Sufeng
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:30 AM, <discuss-request at mpich.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Send discuss mailing list submissions to
> >> > discuss at mpich.org
> >> >
> >> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >> > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >> > discuss-request at mpich.org
> >> >
> >> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >> > discuss-owner at mpich.org
> >> >
> >> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >> > than "Re: Contents of discuss digest..."
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Today's Topics:
> >> >
> >> > 1. Re: MPI_Win_fence failed (Sufeng Niu)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >
> >> > Message: 1
> >> > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:30:36 -0500
> >> > From: Sufeng Niu <sniu at hawk.iit.edu>
> >> > To: discuss at mpich.org
> >> > Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] MPI_Win_fence failed
> >> > Message-ID:
> >> > <
> >> > CAFNNHkyLj8CbYMmc_w2DA9_+q2Oe3kyus+g6c99ShPk6ZXVkdA at mail.gmail.com>
> >> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >> >
> >> > Hi Jim,
> >> >
> >> > Thanks a lot for your reply. the basic way for me to debugging is
> >> > barrier+printf, right now I only have an evaluation version of
> >> > totalview.
> >> > the backtrace using totalview shown below. the udp is the udp
> collection
> >> > and create RMA window, image_rms doing MPI_Get to access the window
> >> >
> >> > There is a segment violation, but I don't know why the program
> stopped
> >> > at
> >> > MPI_Win_fence.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks a lot!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:12 AM, <discuss-request at mpich.org> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Send discuss mailing list submissions to
> >> > > discuss at mpich.org
> >> > >
> >> > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >> > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >> > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >> > > discuss-request at mpich.org
> >> > >
> >> > > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >> > > discuss-owner at mpich.org
> >> > >
> >> > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >> > > than "Re: Contents of discuss digest..."
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Today's Topics:
> >> > >
> >> > > 1. Re: MPICH3.0.4 make fails with "No rule to make target..."
> >> > > (Wesley Bland)
> >> > > 2. Re: Error in MPI_Finalize on a simple ring test over TCP
> >> > > (Wesley Bland)
> >> > > 3. Restrict number of cores, not threads (Bob Ilgner)
> >> > > 4. Re: Restrict number of cores, not threads (Wesley Bland)
> >> > > 5. Re: Restrict number of cores, not threads (Wesley Bland)
> >> > > 6. Re: Error in MPI_Finalize on a simple ring test over TCP
> >> > > (Thomas Ropars)
> >> > > 7. MPI_Win_fence failed (Sufeng Niu)
> >> > > 8. Re: MPI_Win_fence failed (Jim Dinan)
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >
> >> > > Message: 1
> >> > > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:29:06 -0500
> >> > > From: Wesley Bland <wbland at mcs.anl.gov>
> >> > > To: discuss at mpich.org
> >> > > Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] MPICH3.0.4 make fails with "No rule to
> >> > > make target..."
> >> > > Message-ID: <F48FC916-31F7-4F82-95F8-2D6A6C45264F at mcs.anl.gov>
> >> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >> > >
> >> > > Unfortunately, due to the lack of developer resources and interest,
> >> > > the
> >> > > last version of MPICH which was supported on Windows was 1.4.1p. You
> >> > > can
> >> > > find that version on the downloads page:
> >> > >
> >> > > http://www.mpich.org/downloads/
> >> > >
> >> > > Alternatively, Microsoft maintains a derivative of MPICH which
> should
> >> > > provide the features you need. You also find a link to that on the
> >> > > downloads page above.
> >> > >
> >> > > Wesley
> >> > >
> >> > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 1:16 AM, Don Warren <don.warren at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hello,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > As requested in the installation guide, I'm informing this list
> of a
> >> > > failure to correctly make MPICH3.0.4 on a Win7 system. The specific
> >> > error
> >> > > encountered is
> >> > > > "make[2]: *** No rule to make target
> >> > > `/cygdrive/c/FLASH/mpich-3.0.4/src/mpi/romio/Makefile.am', needed by
> >> > > `/cygdrive/c/FLASH/mpich-3.0.4/src/mpi/romio/Makefile.in'. Stop."
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I have confirmed that both Makefile.am and Makefile.in exist in
> the
> >> > > directory listed. I'm attaching the c.txt and the m.txt files.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Possibly of interest is that the command "make clean" fails at
> >> > > > exactly
> >> > > the same folder, with exactly the same error message as shown in
> m.txt
> >> > and
> >> > > above.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Any advice you can give would be appreciated. I'm attempting to
> get
> >> > > FLASH running on my computer, which seems to require MPICH.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Regards,
> >> > > > Don Warren
> >> > > >
> >> >
> <config-make-outputs.zip>_______________________________________________
> >> > > > discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> >> > > > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> >> > > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >> > >
> >> > > -------------- next part --------------
> >> > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> > > URL: <
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130710/69b497f1/attachment-0001.html
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > ------------------------------
> >> > >
> >> > > Message: 2
> >> > > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:39:47 -0500
> >> > > From: Wesley Bland <wbland at mcs.anl.gov>
> >> > > To: discuss at mpich.org
> >> > > Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] Error in MPI_Finalize on a simple ring
> >> > > test over TCP
> >> > > Message-ID: <D5999106-2A75-4091-8B0F-EAFA22880862 at mcs.anl.gov>
> >> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >> > >
> >> > > The value of previous for rank 0 in your code is -1. MPICH is
> >> > > complaining
> >> > > because all of the requests to receive a message from -1 are still
> >> > pending
> >> > > when you try to finalize. You need to make sure that you are
> receiving
> >> > from
> >> > > valid ranks.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:50 AM, Thomas Ropars <thomas.ropars at epfl.ch>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Yes sure. Here it is.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thomas
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On 07/10/2013 02:23 PM, Wesley Bland wrote:
> >> > > >> Can you send us the smallest chunk of code that still exhibits
> this
> >> > > error?
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Wesley
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> On Jul 10, 2013, at 6:54 AM, Thomas Ropars <
> thomas.ropars at epfl.ch>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>> Hi all,
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> I get the following error when I try to run a simple application
> >> > > implementing a ring (each process sends to rank+1 and receives from
> >> > > rank-1). More precisely, the error occurs during the call to
> >> > MPI_Finalize():
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> Assertion failed in file
> >> > > src/mpid/ch3/channels/nemesis/netmod/tcp/socksm.c at line 363:
> >> > sc->pg_is_set
> >> > > >>> internal ABORT - process 0
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> Does anybody else also noticed the same error?
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> Here are all the details about my test:
> >> > > >>> - The error is generated with mpich-3.0.2 (but I noticed the
> exact
> >> > > same error with mpich-3.0.4)
> >> > > >>> - I am using IPoIB for communication between nodes (The same
> thing
> >> > > happens over Ethernet)
> >> > > >>> - The problem comes from TCP links. When all processes are on
> the
> >> > same
> >> > > node, there is no error. As soon as one process is on a remote node,
> >> > > the
> >> > > failure occurs.
> >> > > >>> - Note also that the failure does not occur if I run a more
> >> > > >>> complex
> >> > > code (eg, a NAS benchmark).
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> Thomas Ropars
> >> > > >>> _______________________________________________
> >> > > >>> discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> >> > > >>> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> >> > > >>> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >> > > >> _______________________________________________
> >> > > >> discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> >> > > >> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> >> > > >> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >
> >> > > > <ring_clean.c>_______________________________________________
> >> > > > discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> >> > > > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> >> > > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > ------------------------------
> >> > >
> >> > > Message: 3
> >> > > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:41:27 +0200
> >> > > From: Bob Ilgner <bobilgner at gmail.com>
> >> > > To: mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
> >> > > Subject: [mpich-discuss] Restrict number of cores, not threads
> >> > > Message-ID:
> >> > > <
> >> > > CAKv15b-QgmHkVkoiTFmP3EZXvyy6sc_QeqHQgbMUhnr3Xh9ecA at mail.gmail.com>
> >> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >> > >
> >> > > Dear all,
> >> > >
> >> > > I am working on a shared memory processor with 256 cores. I am
> working
> >> > from
> >> > > the command line directly.
> >> > >
> >> > > Can I restict the number of cores that I deploy.The command
> >> > >
> >> > > mpirun -n 100 myprog
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > will automatically start on 100 cores. I wish to use only 10 cores
> and
> >> > have
> >> > > 10 threads on each core. Can I do this with mpich ? Rememebre that
> >> > > this
> >> > an
> >> > > smp abd I can not identify each core individually(as in a cluster)
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards, bob
> >> > > -------------- next part --------------
> >> > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> > > URL: <
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130710/ec659e91/attachment-0001.html
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > ------------------------------
> >> > >
> >> > > Message: 4
> >> > > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:46:38 -0500
> >> > > From: Wesley Bland <wbland at mcs.anl.gov>
> >> > > To: discuss at mpich.org
> >> > > Cc: mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
> >> > > Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] Restrict number of cores, not threads
> >> > > Message-ID: <2FAF588E-2FBE-45E4-B53F-E6BC931E3D51 at mcs.anl.gov>
> >> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> >> > >
> >> > > Threads in MPI are not ranks. When you say you want to launch with
> -n
> >> > 100,
> >> > > you will always get 100 processes, not threads. If you want 10
> threads
> >> > > on
> >> > > 10 cores, you will need to launch with -n 10, then add your threads
> >> > > according to your threading library.
> >> > >
> >> > > Note that threads in MPI do not get their own rank currently. They
> all
> >> > > share the same rank as the process in which they reside, so if you
> >> > > need
> >> > to
> >> > > be able to handle things with different ranks, you'll need to use
> >> > > actual
> >> > > processes.
> >> > >
> >> > > Wesley
> >> > >
> >> > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Bob Ilgner <bobilgner at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Dear all,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I am working on a shared memory processor with 256 cores. I am
> >> > > > working
> >> > > from the command line directly.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Can I restict the number of cores that I deploy.The command
> >> > > >
> >> > > > mpirun -n 100 myprog
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > will automatically start on 100 cores. I wish to use only 10 cores
> >> > > > and
> >> > > have 10 threads on each core. Can I do this with mpich ? Rememebre
> >> > > that
> >> > > this an smp abd I can not identify each core individually(as in a
> >> > cluster)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Regards, bob
> >> > > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > > discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> >> > > > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> >> > > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > ------------------------------
> >> > >
> >> > > Message: 5
> >> > > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:46:38 -0500
> >> > > From: Wesley Bland <wbland at mcs.anl.gov>
> >> > > To: discuss at mpich.org
> >> > > Cc: mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
> >> > > Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] Restrict number of cores, not threads
> >> > > Message-ID: <2FAF588E-2FBE-45E4-B53F-E6BC931E3D51 at mcs.anl.gov>
> >> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> >> > >
> >> > > Threads in MPI are not ranks. When you say you want to launch with
> -n
> >> > 100,
> >> > > you will always get 100 processes, not threads. If you want 10
> threads
> >> > > on
> >> > > 10 cores, you will need to launch with -n 10, then add your threads
> >> > > according to your threading library.
> >> > >
> >> > > Note that threads in MPI do not get their own rank currently. They
> all
> >> > > share the same rank as the process in which they reside, so if you
> >> > > need
> >> > to
> >> > > be able to handle things with different ranks, you'll need to use
> >> > > actual
> >> > > processes.
> >> > >
> >> > > Wesley
> >> > >
> >> > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Bob Ilgner <bobilgner at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Dear all,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I am working on a shared memory processor with 256 cores. I am
> >> > > > working
> >> > > from the command line directly.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Can I restict the number of cores that I deploy.The command
> >> > > >
> >> > > > mpirun -n 100 myprog
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > will automatically start on 100 cores. I wish to use only 10 cores
> >> > > > and
> >> > > have 10 threads on each core. Can I do this with mpich ? Rememebre
> >> > > that
> >> > > this an smp abd I can not identify each core individually(as in a
> >> > cluster)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Regards, bob
> >> > > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > > discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> >> > > > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> >> > > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > ------------------------------
> >> > >
> >> > > Message: 6
> >> > > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:50:36 +0200
> >> > > From: Thomas Ropars <thomas.ropars at epfl.ch>
> >> > > To: discuss at mpich.org
> >> > > Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] Error in MPI_Finalize on a simple ring
> >> > > test over TCP
> >> > > Message-ID: <51DD74BC.3020009 at epfl.ch>
> >> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> >> > >
> >> > > Yes, you are right, sorry for disturbing.
> >> > >
> >> > > On 07/10/2013 03:39 PM, Wesley Bland wrote:
> >> > > > The value of previous for rank 0 in your code is -1. MPICH is
> >> > > complaining because all of the requests to receive a message from -1
> >> > > are
> >> > > still pending when you try to finalize. You need to make sure that
> you
> >> > are
> >> > > receiving from valid ranks.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:50 AM, Thomas Ropars <thomas.ropars at epfl.ch
> >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> Yes sure. Here it is.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Thomas
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> On 07/10/2013 02:23 PM, Wesley Bland wrote:
> >> > > >>> Can you send us the smallest chunk of code that still exhibits
> >> > > >>> this
> >> > > error?
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> Wesley
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> On Jul 10, 2013, at 6:54 AM, Thomas Ropars <
> thomas.ropars at epfl.ch>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>> Hi all,
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> I get the following error when I try to run a simple
> application
> >> > > implementing a ring (each process sends to rank+1 and receives from
> >> > > rank-1). More precisely, the error occurs during the call to
> >> > MPI_Finalize():
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> Assertion failed in file
> >> > > src/mpid/ch3/channels/nemesis/netmod/tcp/socksm.c at line 363:
> >> > sc->pg_is_set
> >> > > >>>> internal ABORT - process 0
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> Does anybody else also noticed the same error?
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> Here are all the details about my test:
> >> > > >>>> - The error is generated with mpich-3.0.2 (but I noticed the
> >> > > >>>> exact
> >> > > same error with mpich-3.0.4)
> >> > > >>>> - I am using IPoIB for communication between nodes (The same
> >> > > >>>> thing
> >> > > happens over Ethernet)
> >> > > >>>> - The problem comes from TCP links. When all processes are on
> the
> >> > > same node, there is no error. As soon as one process is on a remote
> >> > > node,
> >> > > the failure occurs.
> >> > > >>>> - Note also that the failure does not occur if I run a more
> >> > > >>>> complex
> >> > > code (eg, a NAS benchmark).
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> Thomas Ropars
> >> > > >>>> _______________________________________________
> >> > > >>>> discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> >> > > >>>> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> >> > > >>>> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >> > > >>> _______________________________________________
> >> > > >>> discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> >> > > >>> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> >> > > >>> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >> <ring_clean.c>_______________________________________________
> >> > > >> discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> >> > > >> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> >> > > >> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >> > > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > > discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> >> > > > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> >> > > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > ------------------------------
> >> > >
> >> > > Message: 7
> >> > > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:07:21 -0500
> >> > > From: Sufeng Niu <sniu at hawk.iit.edu>
> >> > > To: discuss at mpich.org
> >> > > Subject: [mpich-discuss] MPI_Win_fence failed
> >> > > Message-ID:
> >> > > <
> >> > > CAFNNHkz_1gC7hfpx0G9j24adO-gDabdmwZ4VuT6jip-fDMhS9A at mail.gmail.com>
> >> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >> > >
> >> > > Hello,
> >> > >
> >> > > I used MPI RMA in my program, but the program stop at the
> >> > > MPI_Win_fence,
> >> > I
> >> > > have a master process receive data from udp socket. Other processes
> >> > > use
> >> > > MPI_Get to access data.
> >> > >
> >> > > master process:
> >> > >
> >> > > MPI_Create(...)
> >> > > for(...){
> >> > > /* udp recv operation */
> >> > >
> >> > > MPI_Barrier // to let other process know data received from udp is
> >> > > ready
> >> > >
> >> > > MPI_Win_fence(0, win);
> >> > > MPI_Win_fence(0, win);
> >> > >
> >> > > }
> >> > >
> >> > > other processes:
> >> > >
> >> > > for(...){
> >> > >
> >> > > MPI_Barrier // sync for udp data ready
> >> > >
> >> > > MPI_Win_fence(0, win);
> >> > >
> >> > > MPI_Get();
> >> > >
> >> > > MPI_Win_fence(0, win); <-- program stopped here
> >> > >
> >> > > /* other operation */
> >> > > }
> >> > >
> >> > > I found that the program stopped at second MPI_Win_fence, the
> terminal
> >> > > output is:
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> ===================================================================================
> >> > > = BAD TERMINATION OF ONE OF YOUR APPLICATION PROCESSES
> >> > > = EXIT CODE: 11
> >> > > = CLEANING UP REMAINING PROCESSES
> >> > > = YOU CAN IGNORE THE BELOW CLEANUP MESSAGES
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> ===================================================================================
> >> > > YOUR APPLICATION TERMINATED WITH THE EXIT STRING: Segmentation fault
> >> > > (signal 11)
> >> > > This typically refers to a problem with your application.
> >> > > Please see the FAQ page for debugging suggestions
> >> > >
> >> > > Do you have any suggestions? Thank you very much!
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Best Regards,
> >> > > Sufeng Niu
> >> > > ECASP lab, ECE department, Illinois Institute of Technology
> >> > > Tel: 312-731-7219
> >> > > -------------- next part --------------
> >> > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> > > URL: <
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130710/375a95ac/attachment-0001.html
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > ------------------------------
> >> > >
> >> > > Message: 8
> >> > > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:12:45 -0400
> >> > > From: Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com>
> >> > > To: discuss at mpich.org
> >> > > Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] MPI_Win_fence failed
> >> > > Message-ID:
> >> > > <CAOoEU4F3hX=y3yrJKYKucNeiueQYBeR_3OQas9E+mg+GM6Rz=
> >> > > w at mail.gmail.com>
> >> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >> > >
> >> > > It's hard to tell where the segmentation fault is coming from. Can
> >> > > you
> >> > use
> >> > > a debugger to generate a backtrace?
> >> > >
> >> > > ~Jim.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Sufeng Niu <sniu at hawk.iit.edu>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hello,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I used MPI RMA in my program, but the program stop at the
> >> > MPI_Win_fence,
> >> > > I
> >> > > > have a master process receive data from udp socket. Other
> processes
> >> > > > use
> >> > > > MPI_Get to access data.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > master process:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > MPI_Create(...)
> >> > > > for(...){
> >> > > > /* udp recv operation */
> >> > > >
> >> > > > MPI_Barrier // to let other process know data received from udp
> is
> >> > ready
> >> > > >
> >> > > > MPI_Win_fence(0, win);
> >> > > > MPI_Win_fence(0, win);
> >> > > >
> >> > > > }
> >> > > >
> >> > > > other processes:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > for(...){
> >> > > >
> >> > > > MPI_Barrier // sync for udp data ready
> >> > > >
> >> > > > MPI_Win_fence(0, win);
> >> > > >
> >> > > > MPI_Get();
> >> > > >
> >> > > > MPI_Win_fence(0, win); <-- program stopped here
> >> > > >
> >> > > > /* other operation */
> >> > > > }
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I found that the program stopped at second MPI_Win_fence, the
> >> > > > terminal
> >> > > > output is:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> ===================================================================================
> >> > > > = BAD TERMINATION OF ONE OF YOUR APPLICATION PROCESSES
> >> > > > = EXIT CODE: 11
> >> > > > = CLEANING UP REMAINING PROCESSES
> >> > > > = YOU CAN IGNORE THE BELOW CLEANUP MESSAGES
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> ===================================================================================
> >> > > > YOUR APPLICATION TERMINATED WITH THE EXIT STRING: Segmentation
> fault
> >> > > > (signal 11)
> >> > > > This typically refers to a problem with your application.
> >> > > > Please see the FAQ page for debugging suggestions
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Do you have any suggestions? Thank you very much!
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > Best Regards,
> >> > > > Sufeng Niu
> >> > > > ECASP lab, ECE department, Illinois Institute of Technology
> >> > > > Tel: 312-731-7219
> >> > > >
> >> > > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > > discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> >> > > > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> >> > > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >> > > >
> >> > > -------------- next part --------------
> >> > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> > > URL: <
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130710/48c5f337/attachment.html
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > ------------------------------
> >> > >
> >> > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > discuss mailing list
> >> > > discuss at mpich.org
> >> > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >> > >
> >> > > End of discuss Digest, Vol 9, Issue 27
> >> > > **************************************
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Best Regards,
> >> > Sufeng Niu
> >> > ECASP lab, ECE department, Illinois Institute of Technology
> >> > Tel: 312-731-7219
> >> > -------------- next part --------------
> >> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> > URL: <
> >> >
> >> >
> http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130710/57a5e76f/attachment.html
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > ------------------------------
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > discuss mailing list
> >> > discuss at mpich.org
> >> > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >> >
> >> > End of discuss Digest, Vol 9, Issue 28
> >> > **************************************
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Sufeng Niu
> >> ECASP lab, ECE department, Illinois Institute of Technology
> >> Tel: 312-731-7219
> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> URL:
> >> <
> http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130710/48296a33/attachment.html
> >
> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> >> Name: Screenshot.png
> >> Type: image/png
> >> Size: 131397 bytes
> >> Desc: not available
> >> URL:
> >> <
> http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130710/48296a33/attachment.png
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> discuss mailing list
> >> discuss at mpich.org
> >> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >>
> >> End of discuss Digest, Vol 9, Issue 29
> >> **************************************
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> > Sufeng Niu
> > ECASP lab, ECE department, Illinois Institute of Technology
> > Tel: 312-731-7219
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>
> --
> Jeff Hammond
> jeff.science at gmail.com
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:08:19 -0500
> From: Sufeng Niu <sniu at hawk.iit.edu>
> To: discuss at mpich.org
> Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] MPI_Win_fence failed
> Message-ID:
> <CAFNNHkzu0GYT0qSdWx1VQz0+V7mg5d=
> tZFQm-MHPVoCyKfiYSA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Oh, yeah, that would be an easier way. I just create a repository in
> github. you can
> git clone https://github.com/sufengniu/mpi_app_test.git
>
> to run the program. you need to install a tif library. I know ubuntu is
> sudo apt-get install libtiff4-dev.
> after you download it. just make
> then there will be 2 bin file,
>
> please change hostfile to your machine, first run mpi: ./run.perl main
>
> then run ./udp_client 55Fe_run5_dark.tif
>
> Thanks a lot!
> Sufeng
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:57 AM, <discuss-request at mpich.org> wrote:
>
> > Send discuss mailing list submissions to
> > discuss at mpich.org
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > discuss-request at mpich.org
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > discuss-owner at mpich.org
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of discuss digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. Re: MPI_Win_fence failed (Jeff Hammond)
> > 2. Re: MPI_Win_fence failed (Sufeng Niu)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:46:08 -0500
> > From: Jeff Hammond <jeff.science at gmail.com>
> > To: discuss at mpich.org
> > Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] MPI_Win_fence failed
> > Message-ID:
> > <CAGKz=
> > uLiq6rur+15MBip5U-_AS2JWefYOHfX07b1dkR8POOk6A at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > Just post the code so we can run it.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Sufeng Niu <sniu at hawk.iit.edu> wrote:
> > > Sorry I forget to add screen shot for backtrace. the screen shot is
> > > attached.
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot!
> > >
> > > Sufeng
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:30 AM, <discuss-request at mpich.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Send discuss mailing list submissions to
> > >> discuss at mpich.org
> > >>
> > >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > >> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > >> discuss-request at mpich.org
> > >>
> > >> You can reach the person managing the list at
> > >> discuss-owner at mpich.org
> > >>
> > >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > >> than "Re: Contents of discuss digest..."
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Today's Topics:
> > >>
> > >> 1. Re: MPI_Win_fence failed (Sufeng Niu)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>
> > >> Message: 1
> > >> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:30:36 -0500
> > >> From: Sufeng Niu <sniu at hawk.iit.edu>
> > >> To: discuss at mpich.org
> > >> Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] MPI_Win_fence failed
> > >> Message-ID:
> > >>
> > >> <CAFNNHkyLj8CbYMmc_w2DA9_+q2Oe3kyus+g6c99ShPk6ZXVkdA at mail.gmail.com>
> > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Hi Jim,
> > >>
> > >> Thanks a lot for your reply. the basic way for me to debugging is
> > >> barrier+printf, right now I only have an evaluation version of
> > totalview.
> > >> the backtrace using totalview shown below. the udp is the udp
> collection
> > >> and create RMA window, image_rms doing MPI_Get to access the window
> > >>
> > >> There is a segment violation, but I don't know why the program
> stopped
> > at
> > >> MPI_Win_fence.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks a lot!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:12 AM, <discuss-request at mpich.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Send discuss mailing list submissions to
> > >> > discuss at mpich.org
> > >> >
> > >> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > >> > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > >> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > >> > discuss-request at mpich.org
> > >> >
> > >> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > >> > discuss-owner at mpich.org
> > >> >
> > >> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > >> > than "Re: Contents of discuss digest..."
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Today's Topics:
> > >> >
> > >> > 1. Re: MPICH3.0.4 make fails with "No rule to make target..."
> > >> > (Wesley Bland)
> > >> > 2. Re: Error in MPI_Finalize on a simple ring test over TCP
> > >> > (Wesley Bland)
> > >> > 3. Restrict number of cores, not threads (Bob Ilgner)
> > >> > 4. Re: Restrict number of cores, not threads (Wesley Bland)
> > >> > 5. Re: Restrict number of cores, not threads (Wesley Bland)
> > >> > 6. Re: Error in MPI_Finalize on a simple ring test over TCP
> > >> > (Thomas Ropars)
> > >> > 7. MPI_Win_fence failed (Sufeng Niu)
> > >> > 8. Re: MPI_Win_fence failed (Jim Dinan)
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> >
> > >> > Message: 1
> > >> > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:29:06 -0500
> > >> > From: Wesley Bland <wbland at mcs.anl.gov>
> > >> > To: discuss at mpich.org
> > >> > Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] MPICH3.0.4 make fails with "No rule to
> > >> > make target..."
> > >> > Message-ID: <F48FC916-31F7-4F82-95F8-2D6A6C45264F at mcs.anl.gov>
> > >> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> > >> >
> > >> > Unfortunately, due to the lack of developer resources and interest,
> > the
> > >> > last version of MPICH which was supported on Windows was 1.4.1p. You
> > can
> > >> > find that version on the downloads page:
> > >> >
> > >> > http://www.mpich.org/downloads/
> > >> >
> > >> > Alternatively, Microsoft maintains a derivative of MPICH which
> should
> > >> > provide the features you need. You also find a link to that on the
> > >> > downloads page above.
> > >> >
> > >> > Wesley
> > >> >
> > >> > On Jul 10, 2013, at 1:16 AM, Don Warren <don.warren at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Hello,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > As requested in the installation guide, I'm informing this list
> of a
> > >> > failure to correctly make MPICH3.0.4 on a Win7 system. The specific
> > >> > error
> > >> > encountered is
> > >> > > "make[2]: *** No rule to make target
> > >> > `/cygdrive/c/FLASH/mpich-3.0.4/src/mpi/romio/Makefile.am', needed by
> > >> > `/cygdrive/c/FLASH/mpich-3.0.4/src/mpi/romio/Makefile.in'. Stop."
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I have confirmed that both Makefile.am and Makefile.in exist in
> the
> > >> > directory listed. I'm attaching the c.txt and the m.txt files.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Possibly of interest is that the command "make clean" fails at
> > exactly
> > >> > the same folder, with exactly the same error message as shown in
> m.txt
> > >> > and
> > >> > above.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Any advice you can give would be appreciated. I'm attempting to
> get
> > >> > FLASH running on my computer, which seems to require MPICH.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Regards,
> > >> > > Don Warren
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > <config-make-outputs.zip>_______________________________________________
> > >>
> > >> > > discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> > >> > > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > >> > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > >> >
> > >> > -------------- next part --------------
> > >> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > >> > URL: <
> > >> >
> > >> >
> >
> http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130710/69b497f1/attachment-0001.html
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> > ------------------------------
> > >> >
> > >> > Message: 2
> > >> > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:39:47 -0500
> > >> > From: Wesley Bland <wbland at mcs.anl.gov>
> > >> > To: discuss at mpich.org
> > >> > Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] Error in MPI_Finalize on a simple ring
> > >> > test over TCP
> > >> > Message-ID: <D5999106-2A75-4091-8B0F-EAFA22880862 at mcs.anl.gov>
> > >> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> > >> >
> > >> > The value of previous for rank 0 in your code is -1. MPICH is
> > >> > complaining
> > >> > because all of the requests to receive a message from -1 are still
> > >> > pending
> > >> > when you try to finalize. You need to make sure that you are
> receiving
> > >> > from
> > >> > valid ranks.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:50 AM, Thomas Ropars <thomas.ropars at epfl.ch>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Yes sure. Here it is.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thomas
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On 07/10/2013 02:23 PM, Wesley Bland wrote:
> > >> > >> Can you send us the smallest chunk of code that still exhibits
> this
> > >> > error?
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Wesley
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> On Jul 10, 2013, at 6:54 AM, Thomas Ropars <
> thomas.ropars at epfl.ch>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>> Hi all,
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> I get the following error when I try to run a simple application
> > >> > implementing a ring (each process sends to rank+1 and receives from
> > >> > rank-1). More precisely, the error occurs during the call to
> > >> > MPI_Finalize():
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> Assertion failed in file
> > >> > src/mpid/ch3/channels/nemesis/netmod/tcp/socksm.c at line 363:
> > >> > sc->pg_is_set
> > >> > >>> internal ABORT - process 0
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> Does anybody else also noticed the same error?
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> Here are all the details about my test:
> > >> > >>> - The error is generated with mpich-3.0.2 (but I noticed the
> exact
> > >> > same error with mpich-3.0.4)
> > >> > >>> - I am using IPoIB for communication between nodes (The same
> thing
> > >> > happens over Ethernet)
> > >> > >>> - The problem comes from TCP links. When all processes are on
> the
> > >> > >>> same
> > >> > node, there is no error. As soon as one process is on a remote node,
> > the
> > >> > failure occurs.
> > >> > >>> - Note also that the failure does not occur if I run a more
> > complex
> > >> > code (eg, a NAS benchmark).
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> Thomas Ropars
> > >>
> > >> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >> > >>> discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> > >> > >>> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > >> > >>> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > >> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> > >> discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> > >> > >> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > >> > >> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >
> > >> > > <ring_clean.c>_______________________________________________
> > >>
> > >> > > discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> > >> > > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > >> > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > ------------------------------
> > >> >
> > >> > Message: 3
> > >> > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:41:27 +0200
> > >> > From: Bob Ilgner <bobilgner at gmail.com>
> > >> > To: mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
> > >> > Subject: [mpich-discuss] Restrict number of cores, not threads
> > >> > Message-ID:
> > >> > <
> > >> > CAKv15b-QgmHkVkoiTFmP3EZXvyy6sc_QeqHQgbMUhnr3Xh9ecA at mail.gmail.com>
> > >> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> > >> >
> > >> > Dear all,
> > >> >
> > >> > I am working on a shared memory processor with 256 cores. I am
> working
> > >> > from
> > >> > the command line directly.
> > >> >
> > >> > Can I restict the number of cores that I deploy.The command
> > >> >
> > >> > mpirun -n 100 myprog
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > will automatically start on 100 cores. I wish to use only 10 cores
> and
> > >> > have
> > >> > 10 threads on each core. Can I do this with mpich ? Rememebre that
> > this
> > >> > an
> > >> > smp abd I can not identify each core individually(as in a cluster)
> > >> >
> > >> > Regards, bob
> > >> > -------------- next part --------------
> > >> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > >> > URL: <
> > >> >
> > >> >
> >
> http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130710/ec659e91/attachment-0001.html
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> > ------------------------------
> > >> >
> > >> > Message: 4
> > >> > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:46:38 -0500
> > >> > From: Wesley Bland <wbland at mcs.anl.gov>
> > >> > To: discuss at mpich.org
> > >> > Cc: mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
> > >> > Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] Restrict number of cores, not threads
> > >> > Message-ID: <2FAF588E-2FBE-45E4-B53F-E6BC931E3D51 at mcs.anl.gov>
> > >> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> > >> >
> > >> > Threads in MPI are not ranks. When you say you want to launch with
> -n
> > >> > 100,
> > >> > you will always get 100 processes, not threads. If you want 10
> threads
> > >> > on
> > >> > 10 cores, you will need to launch with -n 10, then add your threads
> > >> > according to your threading library.
> > >> >
> > >> > Note that threads in MPI do not get their own rank currently. They
> all
> > >> > share the same rank as the process in which they reside, so if you
> > need
> > >> > to
> > >> > be able to handle things with different ranks, you'll need to use
> > actual
> > >> > processes.
> > >> >
> > >> > Wesley
> > >> >
> > >> > On Jul 10, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Bob Ilgner <bobilgner at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Dear all,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I am working on a shared memory processor with 256 cores. I am
> > working
> > >> > from the command line directly.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Can I restict the number of cores that I deploy.The command
> > >> > >
> > >> > > mpirun -n 100 myprog
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > will automatically start on 100 cores. I wish to use only 10 cores
> > and
> > >> > have 10 threads on each core. Can I do this with mpich ? Rememebre
> > that
> > >> > this an smp abd I can not identify each core individually(as in a
> > >> > cluster)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Regards, bob
> > >>
> > >> > > _______________________________________________
> > >> > > discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> > >> > > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > >> > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > ------------------------------
> > >> >
> > >> > Message: 5
> > >> > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:46:38 -0500
> > >> > From: Wesley Bland <wbland at mcs.anl.gov>
> > >> > To: discuss at mpich.org
> > >> > Cc: mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
> > >> > Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] Restrict number of cores, not threads
> > >> > Message-ID: <2FAF588E-2FBE-45E4-B53F-E6BC931E3D51 at mcs.anl.gov>
> > >> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> > >> >
> > >> > Threads in MPI are not ranks. When you say you want to launch with
> -n
> > >> > 100,
> > >> > you will always get 100 processes, not threads. If you want 10
> threads
> > >> > on
> > >> > 10 cores, you will need to launch with -n 10, then add your threads
> > >> > according to your threading library.
> > >> >
> > >> > Note that threads in MPI do not get their own rank currently. They
> all
> > >> > share the same rank as the process in which they reside, so if you
> > need
> > >> > to
> > >> > be able to handle things with different ranks, you'll need to use
> > actual
> > >> > processes.
> > >> >
> > >> > Wesley
> > >> >
> > >> > On Jul 10, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Bob Ilgner <bobilgner at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Dear all,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I am working on a shared memory processor with 256 cores. I am
> > working
> > >> > from the command line directly.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Can I restict the number of cores that I deploy.The command
> > >> > >
> > >> > > mpirun -n 100 myprog
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > will automatically start on 100 cores. I wish to use only 10 cores
> > and
> > >> > have 10 threads on each core. Can I do this with mpich ? Rememebre
> > that
> > >> > this an smp abd I can not identify each core individually(as in a
> > >> > cluster)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Regards, bob
> > >>
> > >> > > _______________________________________________
> > >> > > discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> > >> > > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > >> > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > ------------------------------
> > >> >
> > >> > Message: 6
> > >> > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:50:36 +0200
> > >> > From: Thomas Ropars <thomas.ropars at epfl.ch>
> > >> > To: discuss at mpich.org
> > >> > Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] Error in MPI_Finalize on a simple ring
> > >> > test over TCP
> > >> > Message-ID: <51DD74BC.3020009 at epfl.ch>
> > >> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> > >> >
> > >> > Yes, you are right, sorry for disturbing.
> > >> >
> > >> > On 07/10/2013 03:39 PM, Wesley Bland wrote:
> > >> > > The value of previous for rank 0 in your code is -1. MPICH is
> > >> > complaining because all of the requests to receive a message from -1
> > are
> > >> > still pending when you try to finalize. You need to make sure that
> you
> > >> > are
> > >> > receiving from valid ranks.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:50 AM, Thomas Ropars <thomas.ropars at epfl.ch
> >
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> Yes sure. Here it is.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Thomas
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> On 07/10/2013 02:23 PM, Wesley Bland wrote:
> > >> > >>> Can you send us the smallest chunk of code that still exhibits
> > this
> > >> > error?
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> Wesley
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> On Jul 10, 2013, at 6:54 AM, Thomas Ropars <
> thomas.ropars at epfl.ch
> > >
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> Hi all,
> > >> > >>>>
> > >> > >>>> I get the following error when I try to run a simple
> application
> > >> > implementing a ring (each process sends to rank+1 and receives from
> > >> > rank-1). More precisely, the error occurs during the call to
> > >> > MPI_Finalize():
> > >> > >>>>
> > >> > >>>> Assertion failed in file
> > >> > src/mpid/ch3/channels/nemesis/netmod/tcp/socksm.c at line 363:
> > >> > sc->pg_is_set
> > >> > >>>> internal ABORT - process 0
> > >> > >>>>
> > >> > >>>> Does anybody else also noticed the same error?
> > >> > >>>>
> > >> > >>>> Here are all the details about my test:
> > >> > >>>> - The error is generated with mpich-3.0.2 (but I noticed the
> > exact
> > >> > same error with mpich-3.0.4)
> > >> > >>>> - I am using IPoIB for communication between nodes (The same
> > thing
> > >> > happens over Ethernet)
> > >> > >>>> - The problem comes from TCP links. When all processes are on
> the
> > >> > same node, there is no error. As soon as one process is on a remote
> > >> > node,
> > >> > the failure occurs.
> > >> > >>>> - Note also that the failure does not occur if I run a more
> > complex
> > >> > code (eg, a NAS benchmark).
> > >> > >>>>
> > >> > >>>> Thomas Ropars
> > >>
> > >> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >> > >>>> discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> > >> > >>>> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > >> > >>>> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > >> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >> > >>> discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> > >> > >>> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > >> > >>> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >> <ring_clean.c>_______________________________________________
> > >>
> > >> > >> discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> > >> > >> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > >> > >> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > >> > > _______________________________________________
> > >> > > discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> > >> > > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > >> > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > ------------------------------
> > >> >
> > >> > Message: 7
> > >> > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:07:21 -0500
> > >> > From: Sufeng Niu <sniu at hawk.iit.edu>
> > >> > To: discuss at mpich.org
> > >> > Subject: [mpich-discuss] MPI_Win_fence failed
> > >> > Message-ID:
> > >> > <
> > >> > CAFNNHkz_1gC7hfpx0G9j24adO-gDabdmwZ4VuT6jip-fDMhS9A at mail.gmail.com>
> > >> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > Hello,
> > >> >
> > >> > I used MPI RMA in my program, but the program stop at the
> > MPI_Win_fence,
> > >> > I
> > >> > have a master process receive data from udp socket. Other processes
> > use
> > >> > MPI_Get to access data.
> > >> >
> > >> > master process:
> > >> >
> > >> > MPI_Create(...)
> > >> > for(...){
> > >> > /* udp recv operation */
> > >> >
> > >> > MPI_Barrier // to let other process know data received from udp is
> > >> > ready
> > >> >
> > >> > MPI_Win_fence(0, win);
> > >> > MPI_Win_fence(0, win);
> > >> >
> > >> > }
> > >> >
> > >> > other processes:
> > >> >
> > >> > for(...){
> > >> >
> > >> > MPI_Barrier // sync for udp data ready
> > >> >
> > >> > MPI_Win_fence(0, win);
> > >> >
> > >> > MPI_Get();
> > >> >
> > >> > MPI_Win_fence(0, win); <-- program stopped here
> > >> >
> > >> > /* other operation */
> > >> > }
> > >> >
> > >> > I found that the program stopped at second MPI_Win_fence, the
> terminal
> > >> > output is:
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> >
> ===================================================================================
> > >> > = BAD TERMINATION OF ONE OF YOUR APPLICATION PROCESSES
> > >> > = EXIT CODE: 11
> > >> > = CLEANING UP REMAINING PROCESSES
> > >> > = YOU CAN IGNORE THE BELOW CLEANUP MESSAGES
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> >
> ===================================================================================
> > >> > YOUR APPLICATION TERMINATED WITH THE EXIT STRING: Segmentation fault
> > >> > (signal 11)
> > >> > This typically refers to a problem with your application.
> > >> > Please see the FAQ page for debugging suggestions
> > >> >
> > >> > Do you have any suggestions? Thank you very much!
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Best Regards,
> > >> > Sufeng Niu
> > >> > ECASP lab, ECE department, Illinois Institute of Technology
> > >> > Tel: 312-731-7219
> > >> > -------------- next part --------------
> > >> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > >> > URL: <
> > >> >
> > >> >
> >
> http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130710/375a95ac/attachment-0001.html
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> > ------------------------------
> > >> >
> > >> > Message: 8
> > >> > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:12:45 -0400
> > >> > From: Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com>
> > >> > To: discuss at mpich.org
> > >> > Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] MPI_Win_fence failed
> > >> > Message-ID:
> > >> > <CAOoEU4F3hX=y3yrJKYKucNeiueQYBeR_3OQas9E+mg+GM6Rz=
> > >> > w at mail.gmail.com>
> > >> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > It's hard to tell where the segmentation fault is coming from. Can
> > you
> > >> > use
> > >> > a debugger to generate a backtrace?
> > >> >
> > >> > ~Jim.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Sufeng Niu <sniu at hawk.iit.edu>
> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Hello,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I used MPI RMA in my program, but the program stop at the
> > >> > > MPI_Win_fence,
> > >> > I
> > >> > > have a master process receive data from udp socket. Other
> processes
> > >> > > use
> > >> > > MPI_Get to access data.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > master process:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > MPI_Create(...)
> > >> > > for(...){
> > >> > > /* udp recv operation */
> > >> > >
> > >> > > MPI_Barrier // to let other process know data received from udp
> is
> > >> > > ready
> > >> > >
> > >> > > MPI_Win_fence(0, win);
> > >> > > MPI_Win_fence(0, win);
> > >> > >
> > >> > > }
> > >> > >
> > >> > > other processes:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > for(...){
> > >> > >
> > >> > > MPI_Barrier // sync for udp data ready
> > >> > >
> > >> > > MPI_Win_fence(0, win);
> > >> > >
> > >> > > MPI_Get();
> > >> > >
> > >> > > MPI_Win_fence(0, win); <-- program stopped here
> > >> > >
> > >> > > /* other operation */
> > >> > > }
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I found that the program stopped at second MPI_Win_fence, the
> > terminal
> > >> > > output is:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> >
> ===================================================================================
> > >> > > = BAD TERMINATION OF ONE OF YOUR APPLICATION PROCESSES
> > >> > > = EXIT CODE: 11
> > >> > > = CLEANING UP REMAINING PROCESSES
> > >> > > = YOU CAN IGNORE THE BELOW CLEANUP MESSAGES
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> >
> ===================================================================================
> > >> > > YOUR APPLICATION TERMINATED WITH THE EXIT STRING: Segmentation
> fault
> > >> > > (signal 11)
> > >> > > This typically refers to a problem with your application.
> > >> > > Please see the FAQ page for debugging suggestions
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Do you have any suggestions? Thank you very much!
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > Best Regards,
> > >> > > Sufeng Niu
> > >> > > ECASP lab, ECE department, Illinois Institute of Technology
> > >> > > Tel: 312-731-7219
> > >> > >
> > >> > > _______________________________________________
> > >> > > discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> > >> > > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > >> > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > >> > >
> > >> > -------------- next part --------------
> > >> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > >> > URL: <
> > >> >
> > >> >
> >
> http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130710/48c5f337/attachment.html
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> > ------------------------------
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> > discuss mailing list
> > >> > discuss at mpich.org
> > >> > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > >> >
> > >> > End of discuss Digest, Vol 9, Issue 27
> > >> > **************************************
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Best Regards,
> > >> Sufeng Niu
> > >> ECASP lab, ECE department, Illinois Institute of Technology
> > >> Tel: 312-731-7219
> > >> -------------- next part --------------
> > >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > >> URL:
> > >> <
> >
> http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130710/57a5e76f/attachment.html
> > >
> > >>
> > >> ------------------------------
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> discuss mailing list
> > >> discuss at mpich.org
> > >> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > >>
> > >> End of discuss Digest, Vol 9, Issue 28
> > >> **************************************
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Sufeng Niu
> > > ECASP lab, ECE department, Illinois Institute of Technology
> > > Tel: 312-731-7219
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> > > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jeff Hammond
> > jeff.science at gmail.com
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:57:31 -0500
> > From: Sufeng Niu <sniu at hawk.iit.edu>
> > To: discuss at mpich.org
> > Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] MPI_Win_fence failed
> > Message-ID:
> > <
> > CAFNNHkzKmAg8B6hamyrr7B2anU9EP_0yxmajxePVr35UnHVavw at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > Sorry, I found that this discussion email cannot add figure or
> attachment.
> >
> > the backtrace information is below:
> >
> > processes Location
> > PC Host Rank ID Status
> > 7 _start
> > 0x00402399
> > `-7 _libc_start_main
> > 0x3685c1ecdd
> > `-7 main
> > 0x00402474
> > `-7 dkm
> > ...
> > |-6 image_rms
> > 0x004029bb
> > | `-6 rms
> > 0x00402d44
> > | `-6 PMPI_Win_fence
> > 0x0040c389
> > | `-6 MPIDI_Win_fence
> > 0x004a45f4
> > | `-6 MPIDI_CH3I_RMAListComplete 0x004a27d3
> > | `-6 MPIDI_CH3I_Progress ...
> > `-1 udp
> > 0x004035cf
> > `-1 PMPI_Win_fence
> > 0x0040c389
> > `-1 MPIDI_Win_fence
> > 0x004a45a0
> > `-1 MPIDI_CH3I_Progress 0x004292f5
> > `-1 MPIDI_CH3_PktHandler_Get 0x0049f3f9
> > `-1 MPIDI_CH3_iSendv
> 0x004aa67c
> > `- memcpy
> > 0x3685c89329 164.54.54.122 0 20.1-13994 Stopped
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:39 AM, <discuss-request at mpich.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Send discuss mailing list submissions to
> > > discuss at mpich.org
> > >
> > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > > discuss-request at mpich.org
> > >
> > > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > > discuss-owner at mpich.org
> > >
> > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > > than "Re: Contents of discuss digest..."
> > >
> > >
> > > Today's Topics:
> > >
> > > 1. Re: MPI_Win_fence failed (Sufeng Niu)
> > >
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Message: 1
> > > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:39:39 -0500
> > > From: Sufeng Niu <sniu at hawk.iit.edu>
> > > To: discuss at mpich.org
> > > Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] MPI_Win_fence failed
> > > Message-ID:
> > > <CAFNNHkz8pBfX33icn=+3rdXvqDfWqeu58odpd=
> > > mOXLciysHgfg at mail.gmail.com>
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> > >
> > > Sorry I forget to add screen shot for backtrace. the screen shot is
> > > attached.
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot!
> > >
> > > Sufeng
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:30 AM, <discuss-request at mpich.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Send discuss mailing list submissions to
> > > > discuss at mpich.org
> > > >
> > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > > > discuss-request at mpich.org
> > > >
> > > > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > > > discuss-owner at mpich.org
> > > >
> > > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > > > than "Re: Contents of discuss digest..."
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Today's Topics:
> > > >
> > > > 1. Re: MPI_Win_fence failed (Sufeng Niu)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Message: 1
> > > > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:30:36 -0500
> > > > From: Sufeng Niu <sniu at hawk.iit.edu>
> > > > To: discuss at mpich.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] MPI_Win_fence failed
> > > > Message-ID:
> > > > <
> > > > CAFNNHkyLj8CbYMmc_w2DA9_+q2Oe3kyus+g6c99ShPk6ZXVkdA at mail.gmail.com>
> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> > > >
> > > > Hi Jim,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks a lot for your reply. the basic way for me to debugging is
> > > > barrier+printf, right now I only have an evaluation version of
> > totalview.
> > > > the backtrace using totalview shown below. the udp is the udp
> > collection
> > > > and create RMA window, image_rms doing MPI_Get to access the window
> > > >
> > > > There is a segment violation, but I don't know why the program
> stopped
> > > at
> > > > MPI_Win_fence.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks a lot!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:12 AM, <discuss-request at mpich.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Send discuss mailing list submissions to
> > > > > discuss at mpich.org
> > > > >
> > > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > > > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > > > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > > > > discuss-request at mpich.org
> > > > >
> > > > > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > > > > discuss-owner at mpich.org
> > > > >
> > > > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > > > > than "Re: Contents of discuss digest..."
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Today's Topics:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Re: MPICH3.0.4 make fails with "No rule to make target..."
> > > > > (Wesley Bland)
> > > > > 2. Re: Error in MPI_Finalize on a simple ring test over TCP
> > > > > (Wesley Bland)
> > > > > 3. Restrict number of cores, not threads (Bob Ilgner)
> > > > > 4. Re: Restrict number of cores, not threads (Wesley Bland)
> > > > > 5. Re: Restrict number of cores, not threads (Wesley Bland)
> > > > > 6. Re: Error in MPI_Finalize on a simple ring test over TCP
> > > > > (Thomas Ropars)
> > > > > 7. MPI_Win_fence failed (Sufeng Niu)
> > > > > 8. Re: MPI_Win_fence failed (Jim Dinan)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > Message: 1
> > > > > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:29:06 -0500
> > > > > From: Wesley Bland <wbland at mcs.anl.gov>
> > > > > To: discuss at mpich.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] MPICH3.0.4 make fails with "No rule to
> > > > > make target..."
> > > > > Message-ID: <F48FC916-31F7-4F82-95F8-2D6A6C45264F at mcs.anl.gov>
> > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> > > > >
> > > > > Unfortunately, due to the lack of developer resources and interest,
> > the
> > > > > last version of MPICH which was supported on Windows was 1.4.1p.
> You
> > > can
> > > > > find that version on the downloads page:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.mpich.org/downloads/
> > > > >
> > > > > Alternatively, Microsoft maintains a derivative of MPICH which
> should
> > > > > provide the features you need. You also find a link to that on the
> > > > > downloads page above.
> > > > >
> > > > > Wesley
> > > > >
> > > > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 1:16 AM, Don Warren <don.warren at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As requested in the installation guide, I'm informing this list
> of
> > a
> > > > > failure to correctly make MPICH3.0.4 on a Win7 system. The
> specific
> > > > error
> > > > > encountered is
> > > > > > "make[2]: *** No rule to make target
> > > > > `/cygdrive/c/FLASH/mpich-3.0.4/src/mpi/romio/Makefile.am', needed
> by
> > > > > `/cygdrive/c/FLASH/mpich-3.0.4/src/mpi/romio/Makefile.in'. Stop."
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have confirmed that both Makefile.am and Makefile.in exist in
> the
> > > > > directory listed. I'm attaching the c.txt and the m.txt files.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Possibly of interest is that the command "make clean" fails at
> > > exactly
> > > > > the same folder, with exactly the same error message as shown in
> > m.txt
> > > > and
> > > > > above.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any advice you can give would be appreciated. I'm attempting to
> > get
> > > > > FLASH running on my computer, which seems to require MPICH.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Don Warren
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > <config-make-outputs.zip>_______________________________________________
> > > > > > discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> > > > > > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > > > > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > > > >
> > > > > -------------- next part --------------
> > > > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > > > > URL: <
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130710/69b497f1/attachment-0001.html
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > Message: 2
> > > > > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:39:47 -0500
> > > > > From: Wesley Bland <wbland at mcs.anl.gov>
> > > > > To: discuss at mpich.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] Error in MPI_Finalize on a simple ring
> > > > > test over TCP
> > > > > Message-ID: <D5999106-2A75-4091-8B0F-EAFA22880862 at mcs.anl.gov>
> > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> > > > >
> > > > > The value of previous for rank 0 in your code is -1. MPICH is
> > > complaining
> > > > > because all of the requests to receive a message from -1 are still
> > > > pending
> > > > > when you try to finalize. You need to make sure that you are
> > receiving
> > > > from
> > > > > valid ranks.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:50 AM, Thomas Ropars <thomas.ropars at epfl.ch>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Yes sure. Here it is.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thomas
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 07/10/2013 02:23 PM, Wesley Bland wrote:
> > > > > >> Can you send us the smallest chunk of code that still exhibits
> > this
> > > > > error?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Wesley
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Jul 10, 2013, at 6:54 AM, Thomas Ropars <
> thomas.ropars at epfl.ch
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> Hi all,
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> I get the following error when I try to run a simple
> application
> > > > > implementing a ring (each process sends to rank+1 and receives from
> > > > > rank-1). More precisely, the error occurs during the call to
> > > > MPI_Finalize():
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Assertion failed in file
> > > > > src/mpid/ch3/channels/nemesis/netmod/tcp/socksm.c at line 363:
> > > > sc->pg_is_set
> > > > > >>> internal ABORT - process 0
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Does anybody else also noticed the same error?
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Here are all the details about my test:
> > > > > >>> - The error is generated with mpich-3.0.2 (but I noticed the
> > exact
> > > > > same error with mpich-3.0.4)
> > > > > >>> - I am using IPoIB for communication between nodes (The same
> > thing
> > > > > happens over Ethernet)
> > > > > >>> - The problem comes from TCP links. When all processes are on
> the
> > > > same
> > > > > node, there is no error. As soon as one process is on a remote
> node,
> > > the
> > > > > failure occurs.
> > > > > >>> - Note also that the failure does not occur if I run a more
> > complex
> > > > > code (eg, a NAS benchmark).
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Thomas Ropars
> > > > > >>> _______________________________________________
> > > > > >>> discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> > > > > >>> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > > > > >>> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > > > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > > > >> discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> > > > > >> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > > > > >> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > <ring_clean.c>_______________________________________________
> > > > > > discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> > > > > > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > > > > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > Message: 3
> > > > > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:41:27 +0200
> > > > > From: Bob Ilgner <bobilgner at gmail.com>
> > > > > To: mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
> > > > > Subject: [mpich-discuss] Restrict number of cores, not threads
> > > > > Message-ID:
> > > > > <
> > > > > CAKv15b-QgmHkVkoiTFmP3EZXvyy6sc_QeqHQgbMUhnr3Xh9ecA at mail.gmail.com
> >
> > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> > > > >
> > > > > Dear all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am working on a shared memory processor with 256 cores. I am
> > working
> > > > from
> > > > > the command line directly.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can I restict the number of cores that I deploy.The command
> > > > >
> > > > > mpirun -n 100 myprog
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > will automatically start on 100 cores. I wish to use only 10 cores
> > and
> > > > have
> > > > > 10 threads on each core. Can I do this with mpich ? Rememebre that
> > > this
> > > > an
> > > > > smp abd I can not identify each core individually(as in a cluster)
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards, bob
> > > > > -------------- next part --------------
> > > > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > > > > URL: <
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130710/ec659e91/attachment-0001.html
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > Message: 4
> > > > > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:46:38 -0500
> > > > > From: Wesley Bland <wbland at mcs.anl.gov>
> > > > > To: discuss at mpich.org
> > > > > Cc: mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
> > > > > Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] Restrict number of cores, not threads
> > > > > Message-ID: <2FAF588E-2FBE-45E4-B53F-E6BC931E3D51 at mcs.anl.gov>
> > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> > > > >
> > > > > Threads in MPI are not ranks. When you say you want to launch with
> -n
> > > > 100,
> > > > > you will always get 100 processes, not threads. If you want 10
> > threads
> > > on
> > > > > 10 cores, you will need to launch with -n 10, then add your threads
> > > > > according to your threading library.
> > > > >
> > > > > Note that threads in MPI do not get their own rank currently. They
> > all
> > > > > share the same rank as the process in which they reside, so if you
> > need
> > > > to
> > > > > be able to handle things with different ranks, you'll need to use
> > > actual
> > > > > processes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Wesley
> > > > >
> > > > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Bob Ilgner <bobilgner at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Dear all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am working on a shared memory processor with 256 cores. I am
> > > working
> > > > > from the command line directly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can I restict the number of cores that I deploy.The command
> > > > > >
> > > > > > mpirun -n 100 myprog
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > will automatically start on 100 cores. I wish to use only 10
> cores
> > > and
> > > > > have 10 threads on each core. Can I do this with mpich ? Rememebre
> > > that
> > > > > this an smp abd I can not identify each core individually(as in a
> > > > cluster)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards, bob
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> > > > > > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > > > > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > Message: 5
> > > > > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:46:38 -0500
> > > > > From: Wesley Bland <wbland at mcs.anl.gov>
> > > > > To: discuss at mpich.org
> > > > > Cc: mpich-discuss at mcs.anl.gov
> > > > > Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] Restrict number of cores, not threads
> > > > > Message-ID: <2FAF588E-2FBE-45E4-B53F-E6BC931E3D51 at mcs.anl.gov>
> > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> > > > >
> > > > > Threads in MPI are not ranks. When you say you want to launch with
> -n
> > > > 100,
> > > > > you will always get 100 processes, not threads. If you want 10
> > threads
> > > on
> > > > > 10 cores, you will need to launch with -n 10, then add your threads
> > > > > according to your threading library.
> > > > >
> > > > > Note that threads in MPI do not get their own rank currently. They
> > all
> > > > > share the same rank as the process in which they reside, so if you
> > need
> > > > to
> > > > > be able to handle things with different ranks, you'll need to use
> > > actual
> > > > > processes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Wesley
> > > > >
> > > > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Bob Ilgner <bobilgner at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Dear all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am working on a shared memory processor with 256 cores. I am
> > > working
> > > > > from the command line directly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can I restict the number of cores that I deploy.The command
> > > > > >
> > > > > > mpirun -n 100 myprog
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > will automatically start on 100 cores. I wish to use only 10
> cores
> > > and
> > > > > have 10 threads on each core. Can I do this with mpich ? Rememebre
> > > that
> > > > > this an smp abd I can not identify each core individually(as in a
> > > > cluster)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards, bob
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> > > > > > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > > > > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > Message: 6
> > > > > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:50:36 +0200
> > > > > From: Thomas Ropars <thomas.ropars at epfl.ch>
> > > > > To: discuss at mpich.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] Error in MPI_Finalize on a simple ring
> > > > > test over TCP
> > > > > Message-ID: <51DD74BC.3020009 at epfl.ch>
> > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, you are right, sorry for disturbing.
> > > > >
> > > > > On 07/10/2013 03:39 PM, Wesley Bland wrote:
> > > > > > The value of previous for rank 0 in your code is -1. MPICH is
> > > > > complaining because all of the requests to receive a message from
> -1
> > > are
> > > > > still pending when you try to finalize. You need to make sure that
> > you
> > > > are
> > > > > receiving from valid ranks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:50 AM, Thomas Ropars <
> thomas.ropars at epfl.ch>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Yes sure. Here it is.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thomas
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On 07/10/2013 02:23 PM, Wesley Bland wrote:
> > > > > >>> Can you send us the smallest chunk of code that still exhibits
> > this
> > > > > error?
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Wesley
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On Jul 10, 2013, at 6:54 AM, Thomas Ropars <
> > thomas.ropars at epfl.ch>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> Hi all,
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> I get the following error when I try to run a simple
> application
> > > > > implementing a ring (each process sends to rank+1 and receives from
> > > > > rank-1). More precisely, the error occurs during the call to
> > > > MPI_Finalize():
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Assertion failed in file
> > > > > src/mpid/ch3/channels/nemesis/netmod/tcp/socksm.c at line 363:
> > > > sc->pg_is_set
> > > > > >>>> internal ABORT - process 0
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Does anybody else also noticed the same error?
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Here are all the details about my test:
> > > > > >>>> - The error is generated with mpich-3.0.2 (but I noticed the
> > exact
> > > > > same error with mpich-3.0.4)
> > > > > >>>> - I am using IPoIB for communication between nodes (The same
> > thing
> > > > > happens over Ethernet)
> > > > > >>>> - The problem comes from TCP links. When all processes are on
> > the
> > > > > same node, there is no error. As soon as one process is on a remote
> > > node,
> > > > > the failure occurs.
> > > > > >>>> - Note also that the failure does not occur if I run a more
> > > complex
> > > > > code (eg, a NAS benchmark).
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Thomas Ropars
> > > > > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > > > > >>>> discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> > > > > >>>> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > > > > >>>> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > > > > >>> _______________________________________________
> > > > > >>> discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> > > > > >>> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > > > > >>> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >> <ring_clean.c>_______________________________________________
> > > > > >> discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> > > > > >> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > > > > >> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> > > > > > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > > > > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > Message: 7
> > > > > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:07:21 -0500
> > > > > From: Sufeng Niu <sniu at hawk.iit.edu>
> > > > > To: discuss at mpich.org
> > > > > Subject: [mpich-discuss] MPI_Win_fence failed
> > > > > Message-ID:
> > > > > <
> > > > > CAFNNHkz_1gC7hfpx0G9j24adO-gDabdmwZ4VuT6jip-fDMhS9A at mail.gmail.com
> >
> > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > I used MPI RMA in my program, but the program stop at the
> > > MPI_Win_fence,
> > > > I
> > > > > have a master process receive data from udp socket. Other processes
> > use
> > > > > MPI_Get to access data.
> > > > >
> > > > > master process:
> > > > >
> > > > > MPI_Create(...)
> > > > > for(...){
> > > > > /* udp recv operation */
> > > > >
> > > > > MPI_Barrier // to let other process know data received from udp is
> > > ready
> > > > >
> > > > > MPI_Win_fence(0, win);
> > > > > MPI_Win_fence(0, win);
> > > > >
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > other processes:
> > > > >
> > > > > for(...){
> > > > >
> > > > > MPI_Barrier // sync for udp data ready
> > > > >
> > > > > MPI_Win_fence(0, win);
> > > > >
> > > > > MPI_Get();
> > > > >
> > > > > MPI_Win_fence(0, win); <-- program stopped here
> > > > >
> > > > > /* other operation */
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > I found that the program stopped at second MPI_Win_fence, the
> > terminal
> > > > > output is:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ===================================================================================
> > > > > = BAD TERMINATION OF ONE OF YOUR APPLICATION PROCESSES
> > > > > = EXIT CODE: 11
> > > > > = CLEANING UP REMAINING PROCESSES
> > > > > = YOU CAN IGNORE THE BELOW CLEANUP MESSAGES
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ===================================================================================
> > > > > YOUR APPLICATION TERMINATED WITH THE EXIT STRING: Segmentation
> fault
> > > > > (signal 11)
> > > > > This typically refers to a problem with your application.
> > > > > Please see the FAQ page for debugging suggestions
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you have any suggestions? Thank you very much!
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > Sufeng Niu
> > > > > ECASP lab, ECE department, Illinois Institute of Technology
> > > > > Tel: 312-731-7219
> > > > > -------------- next part --------------
> > > > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > > > > URL: <
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130710/375a95ac/attachment-0001.html
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > Message: 8
> > > > > Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:12:45 -0400
> > > > > From: Jim Dinan <james.dinan at gmail.com>
> > > > > To: discuss at mpich.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: [mpich-discuss] MPI_Win_fence failed
> > > > > Message-ID:
> > > > > <CAOoEU4F3hX=y3yrJKYKucNeiueQYBeR_3OQas9E+mg+GM6Rz=
> > > > > w at mail.gmail.com>
> > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> > > > >
> > > > > It's hard to tell where the segmentation fault is coming from. Can
> > you
> > > > use
> > > > > a debugger to generate a backtrace?
> > > > >
> > > > > ~Jim.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Sufeng Niu <sniu at hawk.iit.edu>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I used MPI RMA in my program, but the program stop at the
> > > > MPI_Win_fence,
> > > > > I
> > > > > > have a master process receive data from udp socket. Other
> processes
> > > use
> > > > > > MPI_Get to access data.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > master process:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > MPI_Create(...)
> > > > > > for(...){
> > > > > > /* udp recv operation */
> > > > > >
> > > > > > MPI_Barrier // to let other process know data received from udp
> is
> > > > ready
> > > > > >
> > > > > > MPI_Win_fence(0, win);
> > > > > > MPI_Win_fence(0, win);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > other processes:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > for(...){
> > > > > >
> > > > > > MPI_Barrier // sync for udp data ready
> > > > > >
> > > > > > MPI_Win_fence(0, win);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > MPI_Get();
> > > > > >
> > > > > > MPI_Win_fence(0, win); <-- program stopped here
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /* other operation */
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I found that the program stopped at second MPI_Win_fence, the
> > > terminal
> > > > > > output is:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ===================================================================================
> > > > > > = BAD TERMINATION OF ONE OF YOUR APPLICATION PROCESSES
> > > > > > = EXIT CODE: 11
> > > > > > = CLEANING UP REMAINING PROCESSES
> > > > > > = YOU CAN IGNORE THE BELOW CLEANUP MESSAGES
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ===================================================================================
> > > > > > YOUR APPLICATION TERMINATED WITH THE EXIT STRING: Segmentation
> > fault
> > > > > > (signal 11)
> > > > > > This typically refers to a problem with your application.
> > > > > > Please see the FAQ page for debugging suggestions
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do you have any suggestions? Thank you very much!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > > Sufeng Niu
> > > > > > ECASP lab, ECE department, Illinois Institute of Technology
> > > > > > Tel: 312-731-7219
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > discuss mailing list discuss at mpich.org
> > > > > > To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> > > > > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > > > > >
> > > > > -------------- next part --------------
> > > > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > > > > URL: <
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130710/48c5f337/attachment.html
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > discuss mailing list
> > > > > discuss at mpich.org
> > > > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > > > >
> > > > > End of discuss Digest, Vol 9, Issue 27
> > > > > **************************************
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Sufeng Niu
> > > > ECASP lab, ECE department, Illinois Institute of Technology
> > > > Tel: 312-731-7219
> > > > -------------- next part --------------
> > > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > > > URL: <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130710/57a5e76f/attachment.html
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > discuss mailing list
> > > > discuss at mpich.org
> > > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > > >
> > > > End of discuss Digest, Vol 9, Issue 28
> > > > **************************************
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Sufeng Niu
> > > ECASP lab, ECE department, Illinois Institute of Technology
> > > Tel: 312-731-7219
> > > -------------- next part --------------
> > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > > URL: <
> > >
> >
> http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130710/48296a33/attachment.html
> > > >
> > > -------------- next part --------------
> > > A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> > > Name: Screenshot.png
> > > Type: image/png
> > > Size: 131397 bytes
> > > Desc: not available
> > > URL: <
> > >
> >
> http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130710/48296a33/attachment.png
> > > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > discuss mailing list
> > > discuss at mpich.org
> > > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > >
> > > End of discuss Digest, Vol 9, Issue 29
> > > **************************************
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> > Sufeng Niu
> > ECASP lab, ECE department, Illinois Institute of Technology
> > Tel: 312-731-7219
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: <
> >
> http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130710/7c5cb5bf/attachment.html
> > >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > discuss mailing list
> > discuss at mpich.org
> > https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
> > End of discuss Digest, Vol 9, Issue 30
> > **************************************
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Sufeng Niu
> ECASP lab, ECE department, Illinois Institute of Technology
> Tel: 312-731-7219
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130710/2de2b7a5/attachment.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at mpich.org
> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
> End of discuss Digest, Vol 9, Issue 31
> **************************************
>
--
Best Regards,
Sufeng Niu
ECASP lab, ECE department, Illinois Institute of Technology
Tel: 312-731-7219
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130710/424361bb/attachment.html>
More information about the discuss
mailing list