[mpich-discuss] Porting MPICH

[Jeff Hammond]

Presumably those functions can be noops if no threads are going to be
used.  Am I wrong?

It might be worth implementing those functions as stubs that abort
with UNIMPL error and see how far that goes.  I'll try to get to this
later today.

Jeff

On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Pavan Balaji <balaji at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> On 05/19/2013 02:28 PM US Central Time, jhonatan alves wrote:
>> But i believe that the missing of POSIX
>> threads can be the most trouble part. So we need to port to the thread
>> implementation in EPOS.
>
> Yup, I too believe that'll be the blocker.  MPICH supports multiple
> threading packages, but currently requires at least one to function
> correctly:
>
> https://trac.mpich.org/projects/mpich/ticket/231
>
> It's been a while since I looked into this issue, but I could look into
> it if you are running into it for your platform.
>
>  -- Pavan
>
> --
> Pavan Balaji
> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list     discuss at mpich.org
> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss



-- 
Jeff Hammond
Argonne Leadership Computing Facility
University of Chicago Computation Institute
jhammond at alcf.anl.gov / (630) 252-5381
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffhammond
https://wiki.alcf.anl.gov/parts/index.php/User:Jhammond
ALCF docs: http://www.alcf.anl.gov/user-guides