[mpich-discuss] Failed to allocate memory for an unexpected message

Thu Jan 16 12:16:55 CST 2014

No, these failures don't occur all the time. I have a successful run (with
my original implementation) which I am using as the base case for
comparison.

On 16 January 2014 16:11, Balaji, Pavan <balaji at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

>
> On Jan 16, 2014, at 12:07 PM, Luiz Carlos da Costa Junior <
> lcjunior at ufrj.br> wrote:
> > However, I noticed that the execution times were much higher than the
> cases in which the failure didn't occur.
> > Is there any reason, apart from some implementation mistake, to explain
> this behavior?
>
> What are the two cases you are comparing?  Are you against comparing
> process failures?
>
>   — Pavan
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list     discuss at mpich.org
> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140116/617f04cd/attachment.html>