[mpich-discuss] Failed to allocate memory for an unexpected message

Balaji, Pavan balaji at mcs.anl.gov
Thu Jan 16 12:11:49 CST 2014

On Jan 16, 2014, at 12:07 PM, Luiz Carlos da Costa Junior <lcjunior at ufrj.br> wrote:
> However, I noticed that the execution times were much higher than the cases in which the failure didn't occur.
> Is there any reason, apart from some implementation mistake, to explain this behavior?

What are the two cases you are comparing?  Are you against comparing process failures?

  — Pavan

More information about the discuss mailing list