[mpich-discuss] Failed to allocate memory for an unexpected message
balaji at mcs.anl.gov
Thu Jan 16 12:11:49 CST 2014
On Jan 16, 2014, at 12:07 PM, Luiz Carlos da Costa Junior <lcjunior at ufrj.br> wrote:
> However, I noticed that the execution times were much higher than the cases in which the failure didn't occur.
> Is there any reason, apart from some implementation mistake, to explain this behavior?
What are the two cases you are comparing? Are you against comparing process failures?
More information about the discuss