[mpich-discuss] Increasing MPI ranks

[Jeffrey Larson]

I was unaware of this issue with mpi4py, but I can reproduce it as well. I
will contact the mpi4py developers.

Thank you again for your help!


On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Lu, Huiwei <huiweilu at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

> Hi, Jeffrey,
>
> The example in mpi4py manual can not run correctly with more than 16
> processes. So I have a reason to believe mpi4py library is not calling MPI
> correctly.
> It would be more appropriate to ask mpi4py developers to support their
> manual example to run more than 16 processes first.
>
> --
> Huiwei
>
> On Mar 11, 2014, at 8:40 PM, Jeffrey Larson <jmlarson at anl.gov> wrote:
>
> > I was using the example from the mpi4py manual:
> > http://mpi4py.scipy.org/docs/mpi4py.pdf
> > (See the lines directly below "Worker (or child, or server) side:" in
> Section 4.3: Dynamic Process Management)
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list     discuss at mpich.org
> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140312/703f1376/attachment.html>