[mpich-devel] Future of MPE?
Jeff Hammond
jhammond at alcf.anl.gov
Wed Oct 16 11:52:01 CDT 2013
In what context is fast configure solving a real problem?
Don Knuth would condemn such a thing IMO.
Jeff
----- Lisandro Dalcin <dalcinl at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 16 October 2013 02:14, Pavan Balaji <balaji at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> > If you mean, I'll do configure/make/make install once and both mpich and mpe will be built, then probably not. This requires a lot of build system hacking for MPE's configure to test for MPI features before the MPI implementation is actually built. That's nasty; we already do that for the mpich test suite and it's a nightmare to maintain. We don't want to do that for yet another package.
>
> Would it make sense to have a "special" and fast configure step for
> MPE when it is built as part of MPICH?
>
> --
> Lisandro Dalcin
> ---------------
> CIMEC (UNL/CONICET)
> Predio CONICET-Santa Fe
> Colectora RN 168 Km 472, Paraje El Pozo
> 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina
> Tel: +54-342-4511594 (ext 1016)
> Tel/Fax: +54-342-4511169
--
Jeff Hammond
Argonne Leadership Computing Facility
University of Chicago Computation Institute
jhammond at alcf.anl.gov / (630) 252-5381
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffhammond
https://wiki.alcf.anl.gov/parts/index.php/User:Jhammond
ALCF docs: http://www.alcf.anl.gov/user-guides
More information about the devel
mailing list