[mpich-devel] when is MPICH going to be count-safe?

[Jim Dinan]

More tests is more better.

A test in hand is worth two in the bush.

:)

 ~Jim.


On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Rob Latham <robl at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 03:25:34PM -0400, Jim Dinan wrote:
> > (Disclaimer: I haven't looked at the branch in question, so please ignore
> > if redundant)  It would be good to commit the test case too, if you
> haven't
> > already added it.
>
> I added large_type to the test suite a while back.  It constructs a
> type not unlike what Jeff describes.
>
> The mere act of committing some of those types makes MPICH blow up, so
> I don't really know how my feature branch can make things worse than
> that! :>
>
> ==rob
>
> --
> Rob Latham
> Mathematics and Computer Science Division
> Argonne National Lab, IL USA
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20131018/28abd0b9/attachment-0001.html>