[mpich-devel] when is MPICH going to be count-safe?
james.dinan at gmail.com
Fri Oct 18 15:19:32 CDT 2013
More tests is more better.
A test in hand is worth two in the bush.
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Rob Latham <robl at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 03:25:34PM -0400, Jim Dinan wrote:
> > (Disclaimer: I haven't looked at the branch in question, so please ignore
> > if redundant) It would be good to commit the test case too, if you
> > already added it.
> I added large_type to the test suite a while back. It constructs a
> type not unlike what Jeff describes.
> The mere act of committing some of those types makes MPICH blow up, so
> I don't really know how my feature branch can make things worse than
> that! :>
> Rob Latham
> Mathematics and Computer Science Division
> Argonne National Lab, IL USA
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel