[mpich-devel] when is MPICH going to be count-safe?

[Jeff Hammond]

We look forward to your patch :-)

jeff

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Dinan" <james.dinan at gmail.com>
> To: devel at mpich.org
> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 3:19:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [mpich-devel] when is MPICH going to be count-safe?
> 
> 
> More tests is more better.
> 
> 
> A test in hand is worth two in the bush.
> 
> 
> :)
> 
> 
> ~Jim.
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Rob Latham < robl at mcs.anl.gov >
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 03:25:34PM -0400, Jim Dinan wrote:
> > (Disclaimer: I haven't looked at the branch in question, so please
> > ignore
> > if redundant) It would be good to commit the test case too, if you
> > haven't
> > already added it.
> 
> I added large_type to the test suite a while back. It constructs a
> type not unlike what Jeff describes.
> 
> The mere act of committing some of those types makes MPICH blow up,
> so
> I don't really know how my feature branch can make things worse than
> that! :>
> 
> 
> 
> ==rob
> 
> --
> Rob Latham
> Mathematics and Computer Science Division
> Argonne National Lab, IL USA
> 
> 

-- 
Jeff Hammond
Argonne Leadership Computing Facility
University of Chicago Computation Institute
jhammond at alcf.anl.gov / (630) 252-5381
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffhammond
https://wiki.alcf.anl.gov/parts/index.php/User:Jhammond
ALCF docs: http://www.alcf.anl.gov/user-guides