[mpich-devel] when is MPICH going to be count-safe?

[Jim Dinan]

All I'm suggesting is that you guys commit the test case that you just ran,
like 5 emails ago.


On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Jeff Hammond <jhammond at alcf.anl.gov> wrote:

> We look forward to your patch :-)
>
> jeff
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jim Dinan" <james.dinan at gmail.com>
> > To: devel at mpich.org
> > Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 3:19:32 PM
> > Subject: Re: [mpich-devel] when is MPICH going to be count-safe?
> >
> >
> > More tests is more better.
> >
> >
> > A test in hand is worth two in the bush.
> >
> >
> > :)
> >
> >
> > ~Jim.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Rob Latham < robl at mcs.anl.gov >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 03:25:34PM -0400, Jim Dinan wrote:
> > > (Disclaimer: I haven't looked at the branch in question, so please
> > > ignore
> > > if redundant) It would be good to commit the test case too, if you
> > > haven't
> > > already added it.
> >
> > I added large_type to the test suite a while back. It constructs a
> > type not unlike what Jeff describes.
> >
> > The mere act of committing some of those types makes MPICH blow up,
> > so
> > I don't really know how my feature branch can make things worse than
> > that! :>
> >
> >
> >
> > ==rob
> >
> > --
> > Rob Latham
> > Mathematics and Computer Science Division
> > Argonne National Lab, IL USA
> >
> >
>
> --
> Jeff Hammond
> Argonne Leadership Computing Facility
> University of Chicago Computation Institute
> jhammond at alcf.anl.gov / (630) 252-5381
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffhammond
> https://wiki.alcf.anl.gov/parts/index.php/User:Jhammond
> ALCF docs: http://www.alcf.anl.gov/user-guides
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20131018/9fc594d0/attachment.html>