[mpich-devel] [mpich-discuss] Use of Signed-off-by in MPICH

"Antonio J. Peña" apenya at mcs.anl.gov
Thu Jan 9 17:21:11 CST 2014

In our group meeting we decided to keep using the Signed-off-by field, 
as it's more convenient for us. This has been clarified in our wiki page 
on the workflow section: 

Thank you for bringing our attention to this.


On 01/05/2014 01:24 PM, Pavan Balaji wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2014, at 11:59 AM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>>> Essentially, it’s what we define it to be.  I guess we could have used
>>> “Reviewed-by”, but I’m not sure it really matters that much.
>> FWIW, I think it's a needless deviation from a widespread convention.
> I’ll bring this up at the next group meeting and see what the other developers think.
>    — Pavan
> --
> Pavan Balaji
> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji

Antonio J. Peña
Postdoctoral Appointee
Mathematics and Computer Science Division
Argonne National Laboratory
9700 South Cass Avenue, Bldg. 240, Of. 3148
Argonne, IL 60439-4847
apenya at mcs.anl.gov

More information about the devel mailing list