[mpich-devel] [mpich-discuss] Use of Signed-off-by in MPICH
balaji at mcs.anl.gov
Sun Jan 5 13:24:17 CST 2014
On Jan 5, 2014, at 11:59 AM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>> Essentially, it’s what we define it to be. I guess we could have used
>> “Reviewed-by”, but I’m not sure it really matters that much.
> FWIW, I think it's a needless deviation from a widespread convention.
I’ll bring this up at the next group meeting and see what the other developers think.
More information about the devel