[mpich-devel] [mpich-discuss] Use of Signed-off-by in MPICH

[Pavan Balaji]

On Jan 5, 2014, at 11:59 AM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>> Essentially, it’s what we define it to be.  I guess we could have used
>> “Reviewed-by”, but I’m not sure it really matters that much.  
> 
> FWIW, I think it's a needless deviation from a widespread convention.

I’ll bring this up at the next group meeting and see what the other developers think.

  — Pavan

--
Pavan Balaji
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~balaji