[mpich-discuss] Paramesh with MPICH2 anyone?

Jeff Hammond jeff.science at gmail.com
Sat Dec 29 17:05:58 CST 2012

Per the instructions on the website, you should contact
paramesh_users at sourceforge.net. All evidence provided (which is not much)
indicates this is not a problem with MPICH and thus this is the wrong list
to handle these issues.

If you want help from this list, at least provide full details about your
system and MPICH build, all of the source code that is failing, and the
full output from failed jobs.


Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 29, 2012, at 4:17 PM, Angel de Vicente <angelv at iac.es> wrote:


Pavan Balaji <balaji at mcs.anl.gov> writes:

On 12/24/2012 10:41 AM US Central Time, Angel de Vicente wrote:

Pavan Balaji <balaji at mcs.anl.gov> writes:

There should not be any difference in which MPI is used for any

high-level library.  Did you try running MPICH with simpler programs?

Does that work correctly?

yes, MPICH2 for simpler problems is working OK. Actually it is working

OK for my own developed version of our code with MPI. But when using

Paramesh it is totally broken. I haven't looked under the hood to try to

find what could be causing these problems, so I was hoping perhaps there

was someone reading this list who had already tried it and had some idea

of what was wrong.

I'm going to be using Paramesh extensively during the coming months, so

I might end up looking into the details myself, but any help will be


Sorry, we haven't played with Paramesh.  Did you try contacting the

paramesh folks?

due to lack of funding, support for Paramesh was dropped in 2008...
Ángel de Vicente
ADVERTENCIA: Sobre la privacidad y cumplimiento de la Ley de ProtecciÛn de
Datos, acceda a http://www.iac.es/disclaimer.php
WARNING: For more information on privacy and fulfilment of the Law
concerning the Protection of Data, consult

discuss mailing list     discuss at mpich.org
To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20121229/663de0cd/attachment.html>

More information about the discuss mailing list