[mpich-discuss] F90 mpi module issues

[Junchao Zhang]

Hello, Walter,
 Thanks for reporting that. I created a bug ticket and you are Cc'ed.
 We hope it can be fixed in the upcoming MPICH 3.1 release soon.


--Junchao Zhang


On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 3:36 PM, W Spector <w6ws at earthlink.net> wrote:

> The implementation of the MPI module in file mpi_base.f90.in and friends
> has serious problems with the various interface blocks.  Specifically, with
> the exception of the final 'ierror' arguments, the dummy arguments
> generally use names of 'v0', 'v1', 'v2', and so on.  Arguments should have
> the names defined by the report so that callers can use keyword=value style
> calls to better document the code.  This is a requirement of the MPI 3.0
> Report (section 17.1.3, third bullet), and MPI 2 as well.  (Though
> admittedly section 16.2.4 of the MPI 2.2 Report is not as explicit in this
> regard as the MPI 3.0 Report is.)
>
> Can this be addressed anytime soon?
>
> Walter Spector
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list     discuss at mpich.org
> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20131114/c76365b1/attachment.html>