[mpich-discuss] Fortran 08 tests with 'use mpi'

[Gregor Corbin]

Updating the F08 tests to 'use mpi_f08' was mostly straightforward. 
However, i ran into problems with three of the tests: irsendf08.f90, 
pssendf08.f90 and prsendf08.f90.

With my modified irsendf08 (attached) for example, the test produces 
these error messages:

      Nonnull request in irsend and irecv
      [           0 ] Unexpected source:           0  in irsend and irecv
      [           0 ] Unexpected tag:           0  in irsend and irecv
      [           0 ] Unexpected count:           0  in irsend and irecv
    Invalid data   0.0 at    1 of  666 in irsend and irecv
    Invalid data   0.0 at    2 of  666 in irsend and irecv
    ...

    Invalid data   0.0 at  666 of  666 in irsend and irecv
       Found          669  errors

That is, the last message from process 1 to 0 is not received correctly. 
When I replace the call to MPI_Waitany with Waitall or Wait there are 
not errors.

Is there maybe a problem with Waitany or did I just do something wrong?

Gregor

On 07.01.22 17:59, Raffenetti, Ken wrote:
> We would consider a patch, yes. First, you would need to sign and return the contributors agreement. https://www.mpich.org/documentation/contributor-docs/
>
> As for whether or not automatic conversion is practical, I think if we structured the tests such that the types needing conversion were easily identifiable, then it could be done. It would require some churn of the existing tests. It may also complicate the addition of new, as the author would need to adhere to guidelines that may not be obvious without prior knowledge.
>
> I gave myself a task to support automatic conversion of the tests the `use mpi_f08`, but it is not very high priority at the moment.
>
> Ken
>
> On 1/7/22, 3:10 AM, "Gregor Corbin via discuss" <discuss at mpich.org> wrote:
>
>      Hi MPICH,
>
>      I noticed that some of the tests in test/mpi/f08 still work with 'use
>      mpi' instead of  'use mpi_f08', mostly in the pt2pt folder. These seem
>      to be copies of the tests in f90 which in turn have been generated by
>      f77tof90.
>
>      Shouldn't these tests be converted to 'use mpi_f08'? If so, would you be
>      interested in a PR that fixes this? I would need to do this anyway.
>
>
>      Kind regards,
>
>      Gregor Corbin
>
>
>      PS.: The interfaces for 'use mpi' and 'use mpi_f08' are probably too
>      different for an automatic conversion to be practical (how to change all
>      the integers to type(mpi_xxx) for example?).
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20220111/6c2a8e68/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: irsendf08.f90
Type: text/x-fortran
Size: 4702 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20220111/6c2a8e68/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5900 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20220111/6c2a8e68/attachment.p7s>