[mpich-discuss] Generalized request classes

[Jim Dinan]

I think it would be reasonable to bootstrap this discussion through the
hybrid working group.  That group is active, and most of the right people
are subscribed to that mailing list.

 ~Jim.


On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

> Jeff Hammond <jeff.science at gmail.com> writes:
> > At this point, you should subscribe to
> > http://lists.mpi-forum.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/mpi3-greq and have
> > further discussion of this issue there.  I copied that list to make
> > the transition seemless.
>
> The mpi3-greq list hasn't had any activity in five years, so it's not
> clear any interested parties are there.  I care quite a bit about
> improving the ability of generalized requests to make progress, mostly
> because I want to be able to implement domain-specific nonblocking
> collectives with similar progress semantics to those provided directly
> by MPI.
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list     discuss at mpich.org
> To manage subscription options or unsubscribe:
> https://lists.mpich.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mpich.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130805/973519ce/attachment.html>